[net-perf] bwctl testing

[Michael Van Norman]

Yes, UCLA uses EGM as our primary path for reasons to be resolved this 
summer.  EGM is not a bandwidth problem.  I can easily get 700-800 Mbps 
to the Abilene bwctl test points.

/Mike

Mark Boolootian wrote:
>>To help satisfy my curiosity about the physical path, I rooted through
>>the rancid configs and cobbled together the attached picture of what I
>>think the HPR path is between UCI and UCLA via SDG-HPR.
> 
> 
> I'm a little confused by the arrows in your diagram.  They seem to imply
> that traffic from UCI to UCLA flows via the SBC gigaman connection.  Or
> am I misinterpreting these guys?
> _______________________________________________
> Network-performance mailing list
> Network-performance at lists.cenic.org
> http://lists.cenic.org/mailman/listinfo/network-performance