[net-perf] Re: RSVP Request: CENIC piPEs workshop

[Michael Van Norman]

Here is the list so far.  I need to know of anybody else ASAP to start
getting food and parking arranged.


Mark Boolootian (UCSC) (parking needed, vegetarian meal)
Carl Hayter (USC) (parking needed)
Mike Hunter (UCB)
Tom Hutton (UCSD)
Mike Iglesias (UCI) (parking needed)
Kevin Kawaguchi (UCD)
ken lindahl (UCB) (parking needed)
Erik McCroskey (UCR)
Tim Paul (UCR)
Michael Sinatra (UCB)
David Visick (UCSD) (parking needed)
Jim Warner (UCSC)
David Wong (UCD)
Sunia Yang (Stanford)

Anybody from Caltech, CENIC, UCSB, or UCSF?

/Mike



On 5/24/05 10:52 AM, "Michael Van Norman" <mvn at ucla.edu> wrote:

> I need to start finalizing the attendee count for next month's workshop, so
> it is now time to officially RSVP.  Please let me know by Friday if you
> intend to attend and whether or not you will need parking.  Also let me know
> if you have any special dietary, or other, needs.
> 
> We will review the agenda and requirements for the meeting at the HPR-TAC
> meeting on Thursday.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> /Mike
> 
> On 5/3/05 3:11 PM, "Michael Van Norman" <mvn at ucla.edu> wrote:
> 
>> The workshop will be Wednesday and Thursday (June 29 and 30) at UCLA, so
>> book your calendars.  I'll leave it to Russ to send out the agenda
>> specifics.  The "Visitors" link of the UCLA Homepage (www.ucla.edu) will
>> lead you to area hotels.
>> 
>> /Mike
>> 
>> 
>> On 4/22/05 1:13 PM, "Michael Van Norman" <mvn at ucla.edu> wrote:
>> 
>>> To update everybody on progress.  ken and I have been working with Russ
>>> Hobby to host an E2Epi Network Performance Workshop
>>> (http://e2epi.internet2.edu/network-perf-wk/index.html) at UCLA the week
>>> of June 27.  The exact dates are still being worked out.  The agenda
>>> will probably vary from what is on the web site as they are still
>>> working on the format, but it will be two days in length.  It looks like
>>> we will be getting space to handle two people from each HPR connector +
>>> CENIC (so you can start fighting amongst yourselves now :).  Even though
>>> the dates are not yet set, I wanted to get this out so you can start
>>> planning your schedules and working on getting the requirements for
>>> participation 
>>> (http://e2epi.internet2.edu/network-perf-wk/requirements.html) into place.
>>> 
>>> I should have all the details by the next HPR-TAC meeting.  My
>>> expectation is that this workshop will kick-off a full piPEs
>>> infrastructure for CalREN.
>>> 
>>> On a related front, Mark and I have been working with the NLANR folks on
>>> the campus network version of their AMP monitors.  I expect that we will
>>> get copies of the code real soon now.  I hope to have something to
>>> present on this effort at the next meeting as well.
>>> 
>>> /Mike
>>> 
>>> Mark Boolootian wrote:
>>>> Hi Garrett,
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> What is the status of deploying Pipes in CENIC? Do we have all campuses
>>>>> on board with doing this? Is there a timeline for deployment? Who is
>>>>> the CENIC expert in this area? How much progress has been made so far?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Mike Van Norman and myself are supposed to be leading the effort to
>>>> promote deployment of performance measurement tools within CENIC.  But,
>>>> sigh, work keeps getting in the way of accomplishing anything useful.
>>>> 
>>>> There is a mailing list associated with this effort:
>>>> 
>>>>   http://lists.cenic.org/mailman/listinfo/network-performance
>>>> 
>>>> but no activity.  I believe Mike was going to draft an email that
>>>> articulated
>>>> recommendations for campus baseline configurations.  At a minimum, that
>>>> would
>>>> include OWAMP and BWCTL.  Running an AMP probe, multicast beacon, and NDT
>>>> server would be extremeley valuable.
>>>> 
>>>> The CENIC expert would have to be Russ.  Russ has attempted to get
>>>> the ball rolling on more than one occasion, but so far there isn't
>>>> anything to report in the way of progress.  UCSC is planning on OWAMP/BWCTL
>>>> deployment (by summer I hope) and I'm fairly certain both UCLA and Berkeley
>>>> plan on deploying said servers as well.
>>>> 
>>>> I think I can safely say that OWAMP/BWCTL are the mechanisms of choice
>>>> for performance measurement within CENIC, and that's the direction that
>>>> most campuses are headed (albeit slowly).  The real trick is overcoming
>>>> the current inertial state.  Please join the mailing list above and
>>>> complain
>>>> about the slack leadership :-)
>>>> 
>>>> mb
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> HPR-TAC mailing list
>>>> HPR-TAC at lists.cenic.org
>>>> http://lists.cenic.org/mailman/listinfo/hpr-tac
>>> 
>> 
>